Submitted scientific material and Scientific Misconduct: Only unpublished articles are accepted for publication in this journal and articles that have not been published anywhere else. Duplicate submissions/publications or publications in which authors merely restate the same data with different words and phrases will not be published. In some cases, if detected only after publication, the journal has the right to publish Retraction Note. In each particular case Editors will undertake advices provided by COPE’s Core Practices then apply them.
Peer Review Process: Our standard policy informs authors that any paper containing primary findings, or secondary analysis of primary findings, including any supporting information, must be reviewed by at least two Referees and our review type is double-blinded. The Editors will be entitled to reject the manuscript without sending it for review, if the research reported in the manuscript does not warrant publication in the journal. Papers rejected (low quality and relevance to the key audience) are sent back to the author(s) without review. The Editor consults other professionals in the right field. Papers published as Research articles and communications are reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers. This end allows authors to recommend persons qualified to review their particular manuscript. However, do please understand that this list above will purely be advisory and the final call on the reviewers will be solely that of the Editor. They include the Editorial Board that participates in the process of decision making about acceptance, with the final decision residing exclusively with the Managing Editor, or with the Editor-in-Chief if there is disagreement.
Authorship: Any contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study should qualify the author to write. There should be a list of all those who have contributed a lot on the work being done so that they are included in the author’s list. Where there are other people who have contributed to some of the material aspects of the research project, then they should be listed in an acknowledgement. The corresponding author should make sure that all qualified persons (as defined above) are included among the authors of the manuscript, and no non-qualified persons are, all co-authors have seen the final draft of the paper, and agreed with its submission for publication.
Ethical conduct: Authors have to report and assure how necessary and appropriate measures have been taken to address ethical concerns if any.
Conflict of interest: An author can only assume the duty to identify and declare any financial or other interest that might be perceived as a conflict of interest and could possibly lead to a compromise of the author’s impartiality at the time of submitting manuscript. In the absence of an explicit acknowledgment, the Editors consider that no interests are in conflict.
Copyright: All the copyrights of the content are preserved under the Creative Commons Attribution Only license (CC-BY).